Sugar Comet

formerotakufinch:

I’m genuinely too embarrassed with myself to look at pictures of my former husbandos.

(via ayubutts)

(Source: daenerystormbornn, via part-l-ypoison)

(via ilovesnapexoxo)

pandaterian:

kobochajunkbox:

animeds7:

yes… yes, of course. thank you, google.

Ah, yes, my mistake. Thank you.

(Source: disregardtheitalics, via ilovesnapexoxo)

comedown:

caffeineandcarpaltunnel:

strawberreli:

stfuconservatives:

(trigger warning for rape, incest, molestation)

networkofwormholes:

[Source]

Declaring that “life must always be protected”, a senior Vatican cleric has defended the Catholic Church’s decision to excommunicate the mother and doctors of a nine-year-old rape victim who had a life-saving abortion in Brazil.

Cardinal Giovanni Batista Re, who heads the Pontifical Commission for Latin America, told reporters that although the girl fell pregnant after apparently being abused by her stepfather, her twins had, “the right to live, and could not be eliminated”.

In an interview with the Italian newspaper, La Stampa, the cardinal added: “It is a sad case but the real problem is that the twins conceived were two innocent persons. Life must always be protected.”

Police believe the girl was sexually assaulted for years by her stepfather, possibly since she was six. That she was four months pregnant with twins emerged only after she was taken to hospital complaining of severe stomach pains.

The controversy represents a PR nightmare for the Vatican. The unnamed girl’s mother and doctors were excommunicated for agreeing to Wednesday’s emergency abortion yet the Church has not taken formal steps against the stepfather, who is in custody. Jose Cardoso Sobrinho, the conservative regional archbishop for Pernambuco where the girl was rushed to hospital, has said that the man would not be thrown out of the Church, because although he had allegedly committed “a heinous crime”, the Church took the view that “the abortion, the elimination of an innocent life, was more serious”.

The case has set off fierce debate in Brazil, where abortion is permitted only in cases of rape or a medical emergency. Brazil is one of the most populous Catholic countries, but conservative attitudes in rural areas are strongly at odds with the relatively progressive public view of abortion in major cities.

Even the President, Luiz Ignacio Lula da Silva, has waded into the row. “As a Christian and a Catholic, I deeply regret that a bishop of the Catholic Church has such a conservative attitude,” he said “The doctors did what had to be done: save the life of a girl of nine years old. In this case, the medical profession was more right than the Church.”

One of the doctors involved in the abortion, Rivaldo Albuquerque, has raised the prospect of public clashes at his local church, telling Globo, the nation’s main TV network, that he would keep going to mass there, regardless of the archbishop’s order. The young girl at the centre of the case escaped excommunication only because she is still a child in the eyes of Church authorities. The stepfather, who is 23, was arrested last week, apparently trying to escape to another region of the country. Police say he is also suspected of abusing the girl’s handicapped 14-year-old sister. He is in protective custody, and if convicted faces up to 15 years in prison.

[source]

Surprised they didn’t force the young girl to marry her rapist, but I suppose that’s only because he was already married to her mother.

The Vatican and everyone in it needs to burn.

I’ve blogged about this story before, but yeah. A stepfather molested his young stepdaughter, and she became pregnant with twins. At age 9. N-I-N-E. That’s basically the definition of “babies having babies.” Her mother found doctors willing to terminate the pregnancy, and they were all excommunicated. But not the stepfather. Because sexually abusing living, actual children is totally cool - the Catholic Church has proved that on multiple occasions - but preventing a nine-year-old from giving birth to her stepfather’s children conceived in rape is worthy of excommunication.

Awful.

-Jess

Holy shit. HOLY. SHIT. What is wrong with you people. She’s NINE. Having twins would have KILLED HER. Not to mention the psychological and emotional damage that comes with giving birth to YOUR STEPFATHER’s bastards. Jesus freaking Christ.

I QUIT.

breaking news today as everyone in the vatican acts like an unimaginable shithead

except it’s not breaking news because they have been unimaginable shitheads for hundreds of years

(via rebelwithoutaflaw)

osakabrownsuga:

v.v

(Source: formerotakufinch, via rebelwithoutaflaw)

xylia-x:

dollymacabre:

JetJ, you kill me.

Reserved this beauty! ^^;;

thedailywhat:

Saying What We’re All Thinking of the Day: Sarah Burge, who is in the Guinness Book of World Records for undergoing the most plastic surgeries, appeared this week on Anderson Cooper’s show, where the “Human Barbie” told the host about how she was getting her daughter on the same process and encouraging her to pole dance.

Finally, Cooper had had enough, and he gave her the boot:

I honestly have nothing more to talk to you about… I gotta be honest, I gotta just stop. I’m sorry. I try to be really polite to all my guests, but I just think you’re dreadful and I honestly don’t want to talk to you anymore.

Cooper later admitted: “I regret having her on in the first place, and I regret that that’s how things ended.”

[towleroad]

alexisbelon:

Australian model caught distracted during a photo shoot when the first plane hit tower 1. What an epic photo.

(via ilovesnapexoxo)

pastelkingdom:

My new heels I am so in loveヽ(；▽；)ノ (Taken with instagram)

(via ilovesnapexoxo)

heyfunniest:

Laughter provides a good workout for the heart, so click here and laugh!!

(Source: prodigal-rhapsody, via ilovesnapexoxo)

golden-dayz:

turquoise blog

(Source: kanahata, via cosmostar)

the-absolute-best-posts:

Follow this blog, you will love it on your dashboard

(Source: awesomephilia)

fuckyeahjapanandkorea:

Flowers of Rice (by bananagranola (busy))

yanbasque:

stephnrice:

glassmountain:

stfuconservatives:

nextyearsgirl:

This is an enormous chain and I’m sorry, but I need to say this:

The laws in the Old Testament were set forth by god as the rules the Hebrews needed to follow in order to be righteous, to atone for the sin of Adam and Eve and to be able to get into Heaven. That is also why they were required to make sacrifices, because it was part of the appeasement for Original Sin.

According to Christian theology, when Jesus came from Heaven, it was for the express purpose of sacrificing himself on the cross so that our sins may be forgiven. His sacrifice was supposed to be the ultimate act that would free us from the former laws and regulations and allow us to enter Heaven by acting in his image. That is why he said “it is finished” when he died on the cross. That is why Christians don’t have to circumcise their sons (god’s covenant with Jacob), that is why they don’t have to perform animal sacrifice, or grow out their forelocks, or follow any of the other laws of Leviticus.

When you quote Leviticus as god’s law and say they are rules we must follow because they are what god or Jesus wants us to do, what you are really saying, as a Christian, is that Christ’s sacrifice on the cross was invalid. He died in vain because you believe we are still beholden to the old laws. That is what you, a self-professed good Christian, are saying to your god and his son, that their plan for your salvation wasn’t good enough for you.

So maybe actually read the thing before you start quoting it, because the implications of your actions go a lot deeper than you think.

/An atheist who understands Christian theology better than Bible-thumpers do.

^

(mic drop)

boom

whoa.

Best commentary ever.

(Source: drunkonstevphen, via happyun-birthday)